21.02.2006

It seems as if I am currently enjoying my personal and proverbial 15 minutes. Yesterday evening, when I came home from my office, I have read the Heise Online news about that Safari security issue, and this seemed interesting enough for me to write a post about that here on the blog. As I try to get more used to post in english (just to enhance my english skills) I have written that post in english as well, and as I am getting used to it, I sent a quick report to digg.com.

I have already dugg some of my posts in the past, but none of them achieved more than about 15 diggs so far, so I didn’t expect too much of that for the particular Safari post as well. Wrong thought, obviously - I didn’t take into account that Apple and their Macs have a particularly larger share on the american computer market than here in Europe. So I was totally stunned this morning when I arrived at the office, opened my email client and was covered with comments on my blog post from one moment to the other.

So I logged in into my counter account for the blog (I am using my own commercial counter service I have started somewhere in 2001 - you can access it at www.powercounter.net) - and it struck me again - more than 5,000 (in words: five thousand!!) visitors since midnight, and there was even more to come! You must know that I am normally used to an average 300 unique visitors per day.

The statistics of my counter then helped me find the reason for this huge traffic increase within seconds - that little digg.com post of mine gathered so much interest and gained so many diggs (more than 600 by that time - now, when I am writing these lines, it’s some 850 diggs) that it has made its way to the startpage - and this resulted in an avalanche of more traffic and diggs.

But even more interesting are the backlinks that story has earned up to now - among several blogs and forum sites are theinquirer.net and bluesnews.com - I suppose I should feel honoured, hmm? ;)

So, to sum this up to some reflective results:

  • if you cover a topic that seems interesting enough for a larger audience, digg it
  • if enough ppl second the interest in this topic by digging it, it’ll make its way to the digg.com frontpage
  • this will result in an avalanche of visitors - make sure you have enough content at hand to keep them onsite (unfortunately, I just have started to post in English rather than in German, so most of my content is yet ununderstandable for most of the new visitors :( - another lesson I’ve learned today)
  • obviously the editors of other large portal sites read digg, too - if your topic is really interesting enough, they perhaps cover the topic as well, setting a backlink to you.

Only one fact is a little embarrassing for me up to this point - I just happened incidentally to be one of the earliest English language sources covering the Safari issue, and my total work on this topic was to read the post from heise online, confirm the issue with their demo and to cover the topic in a small post. That’s, well, journalism? Never thought of myself as a journalist, yet ;) Maybe I should rethink that position? Tell me your opinion!

Verwandte Artikel:



Hinweis: Wegen des hohen Aufkommens an Kommentarspam und als Kommentar getarnten Werbelinks werden alle Kommentare auf diesem Blog zuerst in die Moderation geschickt. Ich schalte neue Kommentare von echten Besuchern so schnell wie möglich frei. Beleidigende oder gegen geltendes Recht verstoßende Kommentare werden gelöscht.

Bisher 3 Kommentare zum Artikel

  1. Manu meint

    Thanks, CZ. ;-) So you submit (?) a post to digg.com, they prove its content and afterwards a link to your article will be set on the site. Then it’s up to the user to digg (you said ‘vote’) for this article. I suppose one can sort articles by the amount of ‘diggs’, right?

    Yep, write a short review please. Me is looking forward to it. ;-)

  2. CountZero meint

    hi manu, thanx for the nice flowers ;) I ran across digg.com by incident a couple of weeks ago. it isn’t directly comparable with technorati, as technorati is a pure blog index site, which is on the other side not true to digg.com. digg.com concentrates on websites with technological background, but isn’t bound only to blogs, but covers usual websites, forum sites and so on as well. the most interesting part about digg is the comparison to slashdot - generally they cover the same topics to a certain degree, but the big difference is, that slashdot is moderated by a few editors and digg isn’t - the topics covered on the frontpage at digg are those that gain the most interest by the digg user community (a digg is similar to a vote, in that context).
    I suppose I should write a short review about digg in the next days. that service is online for about half a year now, and I find it pretty interesting. another similar (and even more web-2.0-ish) service is blinklist.com. in any case, both are really worth a closer look, though digg has the larger user community up to now.

  3. Manu meint

    Congratulations, CZ! ;) I suppose it’s time commenting in english now, isn’t it? I personally never heard of digg.com, so could you please be a bit more specific.
    It’s a site which lists blogs. Got that one. Does it do more than that? And what’s so special about this site? Seems similar to technorati for me.